Two months after her first movie’s premiere and worldwide success, as a new director, Angelina Jolie has announced to the media that she has an idea and is writing a script on the Afghanistan Civil War.
Her debut feature, “In the Land of Blood and Honey”, a critically acclaimed movie about the civil war in the former Yugoslavia has expanded her fame as an emerging director and it proved her talent in making good movies as well in addition to be an extraordinary actress.
This new announcement (...)
News reports on Afghan "war on terror" highly suspect
Stories full of inaccuracies, lazy research, or political axes to grind
Saturday 20 February 2010, by
Since Afghanistan has plunged into chaos, Peshawar has become a favourite destination for journalists arriving from all over the world to cover the Afghan war. Capital of Pakistan’s Frontier province, Peshawar is the gate way to Afghanistan. It takes an hour’s zigzag drive through bushy hills to reaches border post at Torkham. From Torkham, it takes almost three hours to Kabul. A fascinating place surrounded by steep dry hills, Torkham daily receives thousands of people arriving from Afghanistan and Pakistan.
Hundreds of trucks, among them vehicles carrying NATO supplies, line both sides of the no man’s land waiting for hours to get the customs’ clearance. The travelers, however, do not bother customs or passport control. As a matter of fact, hardly anybody carries a passport let alone visa, either to enter Pakistan or reach Afghanistan. Both sides of Pak-Afghan borders are inhibited by Pashtoon tribes.
This artificial border, drawn by British authorities when India was ruled by London, is as absurd as Berlin Wall used to be. Not merely culture, language and religion on both sides of Durand Line are strikingly similar, human features and geography are surprisingly identical too. This similarity is what makes the job of Western journalists easy and helps Peshawar-based journalists make some quick bucks. I realised it when I visited Peshawar in 2002 to do a story my paper Internationalen, a Stockholm-based left-wing weekly.
Some of my former colleagues from Lahore had moved to Peshawar in search of jobs. Some of them had been facilitating, among others, Swedish journalists. I was taken aback when Shahid told me how two Swedish journalists from a mainstream daily stationed themselves at the Swedish Afghan Committee’s guest house, situated in city’s posh Hyatabad neighbourhood, literally hired him to do the stories for them. They were too scared to venture out of the guest house. ’’But very keen to get their hands on exclusive stories’’, Shahid told me with a grin. This indeed was nothing compared to Ahmed Jan’s revelations.
Last year, ahead of general elections in Pakistan, I was working in Rawapindi as interpreter with two journalists from Svenska Dagbladet. Josef el-Mehdi, was reporting for SvD and was keen to go to Peshawar. My friend Ahmed Jan facilitated us in Peshawar. Later in the evening, the conversation over dinner turned to the manner in which Western journalists cover the ’’war on terror.’’
In many cases, Ahmed Jan told us, the local journalists would arrange meetings between Western journalists and fake Taliban commanders. ’’One would take these journalists in the thick of night to his village where the guest journalist would meet a friend or some cousin of the host journalist. This friend or cousin was presented as some big Taliban commander. The ’Taliban commander” could not speak English, but the host journalist knew all the statements the visiting journalist wanted to hear from the Taliban commander, so during “translation” all such statements were produced. An exclusive was ready.’’
Sometimes it was not as superficial as Ahmed Jan narrated. In Kabul soon after the Taliban’s exit, for instance, it would cost only US$50 to bribe a woman (often a beggar on the roadside) into lift her veil for a photo shot. Countless such $50-a-shot pictures were flashed those days on front pages. Such made-up photos are not difficult to get. I bet even Taliban commanders (the real ones, not the fake ones) would agree to pose in any funny posture if the Peshawar-based journalist facilitating a Western journalist enjoyed good relations with the Taliban leadership. And most of the 250 members of Peshawar Press Club do enjoy good relations with Taliban.
Take for example the case of Hakeemullah Mehsud. When Taliban commander Baitullah Mehsud was killed in a drone attack August last year, Hakeemullah succeeded him. For few days, Hakeemullah made headlines the world over. In most of the stories, a smiling Hakeemullah appears holding LMG (Light Machine Gun) that anybody with a basic sense of weapons would tell you is a gun one never holds like this while firing. After seeing the photo, Colonel Jafri, an acquaintance, told me: ’’ The LMG is not exactly a ’shoulder-fired’ weapon. In the photo, Hakeemullah is firing the weapon by holding its bi-pod. It is more for a photo-session to impress the naive journalists, who know not much about the weapons and weaponry, with his prowess and sort of ruthlessness.’’
But all this is indeed innocent compared to what Pakistan’s leading English-language daily, Dawn has reported. According to Dawn, ’’a freelance journalist was arrested making a fake documentary on the Taliban for a foreign TV channel in Balochistan in 2004’’. This free-lancer was working for two French journalists who were also arrested but released since their arrest was an attack on freedom of Western press.
This is, however, only half the story. The mainstream press in Pakistan is as, if not more, incredible. Take for instance, the case of Ahmed Rashid and Hamid Mir. ’Taliban’’ by Ahmed Rashid has almost achieved the status of text book on the Taliban phenomenon. In 2003, renowned Pakistani journalist Hamid Mir, in a column for largest Urdu-language daily Jang, asserted that many facts and anecdotes in ’’Taliban’’ were faked by Ahmed Rashid. I interviewed Ahmed Rashid for Internationalen and asked about the claim Hamid Mir had made. Ahmed Rashid dismissed Hamid Mir’s claim pointing out the fact that the military establishment wanted to discredit him (2).
Hamid Mir, in turn, is suspected to have concocted the only interview Osama bin Laden supposedly granted after September 11. This interview appeared soon after September 11 and made world-wide headlines. ’This interview, a “table-story,’’ was a claim made by all my journalist colleagues at Lahore Press Club when I arrived in Pakistan back in 2002.
Table-story is a popular term used in Lahore by journalists to denote a fake story. Back in 1994-95, I myself and Hamid Mir were working with Lahore-based daily Pakistan. He was a rising star and even back then was dismissed by few colleagues as somebody busy writing table-stories. Others would reject the criticism of Hamid Mir as ’’bullshit’’ generated by jealously.
To dismiss an interview with Osama bin Laden, however, was a big thing. I decided to interview Hamid Mir in 2004. He himself, it seems, knew the rumours making rounds about the credibility of the said interview. Even before I posed a question, he started narrating the details of his trip to Afghanistan where he was to interview Osama bin Laden. His interview narrating these fantastic details, as well as Ahmed Rashid’s interview, mentioned above appeared in the same issue of Internationalen (3). I have no authority either to dismiss or prove of the claims made about both Ahmed Rashid’s ’’Taliban’’ or Hamid Mir’s interview with Osama bin Laden. This anecdotal ’evidence’ is presented here only to highlight the question of credibility regarding the reporting standards and journalistic morals when it comes to the ’’war on terror’’.
This becomes even dangerous when some well meaning left-wing writers in the West and alternative media outlets seize upon reports published in English-language dailies as weighty arguments straight from horse’s mouth.
An example is a story by Amir Mir on U.S. drone attacks targeting the Taliban in Pakistan’s Tribal Areas. According to Amir Mir’s claim: ’’Of the 60 cross-border predator strikes carried out by the Afghanistan-based American drones in Pakistan between January 14, 2006 and April 8, 2009, only 10 hit their actual targets, killing 14 wanted al-Qaeda leaders, besides killing 687 innocent Pakistani civilians. The success percentage of the US predator strikes thus comes to not more than six per cent’’(4).
Who determined whether one was a civilian or an al-Qaida militant, is not described in the story. To question this story in no way is aimed at supporting the U.S. drone attacks on Pakistan. These attacks, like the U.S. occupation of Afghanistan, signify the imperial pride of Empire. These attacks are tantamount to violation of all the international norms a country is supposed to uphold. The point here is to lay bare certain facts.
Amir Mir’s story was widely cited on websites like Counterpunch, Znet and Tomdispatch. Since the well-meaning contributors and commentators on these famous sites perhaps cannot read Urdu, what BBC Urdu reports after every such drone attack, goes missing. Every time there is a attack, BBC Urdu reports that the Taliban encircle the attacked village, allowing no one to either enter or leave until all the dead bodies are removed. This is a fact I was told by journalists in Peshawar and Labour Party comrades living in the Tribal Areas. For many years, local correspondents have fled the area following Taliban threats. All the reports about Tribal Areas under Taliban control are filed from Peshawar by journalists who ring some relative or friend in the area concerned. Sometimes the reporters ask an intelligence official in that area. These reports are neither verified nor questioned by editors before being passed on to the newspaper readership or TV audience.
Also, a fact hardly known outside of Pakistan is the domination of pro-Taliban journalists and columnists throughout Pakistan’s media outlets. Ridiculed by left and liberal circles as “Media Mujahideen,” these journalists and columnists distort the facts, misreport or slant the news, and employ all the dirty tricks of the trade to build an opinion in favour of the Taliban.
Also, like any other country, many known journalists are a “cat’s paw” for Pakistan’s secret services. For example, since Benazir Bhutto was never in the good books of the Pakistan military, she never got much good press. Cornered and frustrated, when she became prime minister, she took a sweet revenge. A list comprising two dozen journalists was leaked to press. These journalists had been receiving monetary benefits from the Intelligence Bureau to feed the readership with falsehoods and half-truths. It is not merely monetary benefits; sometimes journalists in Pakistan go the extra mile out of conviction to glorify or justify Taliban brutalities.
The attack, for instance, on Islamabad’s five-star Marriott in September 2008 was given a specific colour by Ansar Abbasi: ’’Was there a top secret and mysterious operation of the US Marines going on inside the Marriott when it was attacked on Saturday evening? No one will confirm it but circumstantial evidence is in abundance. Witnessed by many, including a PPP MNA and his friends, a US embassy truckload of steel boxes was unloaded and shifted inside the Marriott Hotel on the same night when Admiral Mike Mullen met Prime Minister Yousuf Raza Gilani and others in Islamabad’’ (5).
In a recent talk show on Geo TV, owned by the same media group that publishes The News, Ansar Abbasi claimed: ’’I am proud to be an Islamist’’. When video footage of a girl from Swat valley flogged by Taliban shocked all of Pakistan and drew wide-spread condemnation, Ansar Abbasi appeared on Geo TV and defended the Taliban’s flogging of the girl on the plea that Taliban did what Allah had ordained in Quran. Hence, in his view, condemning the Taliban was tantamount to disrespecting Quran.
His story on the Marriott, lacking all the ingredients of journalistic objectivity, was an attempt to justify the attack on the hotel which claimed the lives of many innocent civilians. Since hatred for the US is (with some justification) probably universal in Pakistan, banking on this hatred Ansar Abbasi attempted to justify the deaths at the Marriott as collateral damage. The PPP MNA (member parliament from Bhutto’s Pakistan Peoples Party, or PPP) mentioned in this news report contradicted the story. However, in a hurriedly written piece for Counterpunch, Ansar Abbasi’s story was cited to convince the readers that the U.S. presence was destabilizing the region. The U.S. presence, no doubt, is destabilizing the region. But we do not have to base our anti-imperialism on half-truths spun either by Media Mujahideen or Western reporters building their exclusive stories on fake encounters with fake Taliban commanders.
Notes and Refrences
1. Names of Peshawar-based journalists, to hide their identity on their request, have been changed
2. Internationalen No. 19/04
Internationalen No. 19/04
3. Internationalen No. 19/04
4. The News, April 10, 2009
5. The News, 21 September 2009
193 36. Sigtuna. Sweden.
Mob: 0046 734 233 794